Why so Few Articles on "Economic and Political Sanity" Blog?

Today the question was put to me, "Why do you publish so few and infrequent articles on your blog, 'Economic and Political Sanity?'"

The answer is simple:  I do not write for a living but merely write and publish when something is important to me.


On the other hand, there are lots of subjects to write about, but I am not interested in writing to just scribble about something...anything.  My gut and my subconscious tell me when and on what to scrawl an article.

My only deadline is when yours truly worries about something that concerns our country, economically or politically.  There are many things to worry about in both of these areas, but this scribe works when there is a sliver of a chance that he can be a catalyst by getting through to a policy or decision maker.

"Economic and Political Sanity" has readers in 19 countries; one reader who is a former President of the United States and several who are current members of the U.S. Congress.

As citizens of this chaotic democratic republic, we should all concern ourselves about the future of this nation.  Our survival as a nation depends on it.

Democracy is not easy; it is expensive and unruly to defend our rights and freedoms, but it is necessary to maintain our republic. Some of us just wish our political leaders would compromise more to get the peoples' business done, instead of digging their heels in on each and every issue.

The Revolutionary Founding Fathers of The United States did not have the luxury of not compromising, as Great Britain wanted their American colonies and tax base back.  Therefore, we fought a second war with England in the early 1800s.  Then France wanted us to fight as their ally in another war before America was able to even stand on its own.

Our politicians need to decide if their own egos or our democracy is more important.

Compromise in Congress, the Senate, and the Executive Branch to get the peoples' business done!

Entrust Has the Keys to the Kingdom, and it Needs to be Sold to the DOJ

Important U.S. partisan vested interests can and do find out anything that they want through the internet about any person or entity on this planet.  No person or entity is safe, as it does not matter who or what they are.  What do you think those same partisan vested interests use that information for?

You do not believe me you say?

Would it surprise you that Entrust, a private U.S. company that has worldwide operations, controls encryption keys for the entire internet?  With encryption keys, Entrust and those associated with it can find out anything communicated on the internet by a person, government official or anyone else, anywhere on this planet.

Jerry C. Jones, a Democrat Party operative, and former law firm partner of Hillary Clinton at the Rose Law Firm, runs Entrust, and it is owned by another Democrat Party operative, Thomas Bravo (Bruce, A. 2018).

It might be to our mutual advantage for you to read Alexandra Bruce's article here:  forbiddenknowledgetv.net/this-is-how-they-can-turn-off-your-chip/

There is not a person, corporation, or government in this world that uses the internet that does not need the encryption capabilities of Entrust.  That kind of power should be based on need-to-know, not personal contacts at the U.S. Democrat Party Headquarters.

In a fair world, it is in the interests of the entire planet that Entrust be sold at a considerable profit to the U.S. government, and then controlled and directed by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ).

Why should it be in the hands of the DOJ?  The U.S. Attorney General on the advice of his staff and other departmental attorneys can legally decide when to share that information with law enforcement, government agencies and sovereign countries.

Why would we want to do that?  Simply put, we want criminal and terrorist activities to be preempted and/or caught and the guilty parties tried in a court of law, domestically and/or internationally.

If there is someone who does not want that to be the case, then they are a part of the problem, not a part of the solution. 

Reference:

Bruce, A. (2018, September 19). Forbidden Knowledge TV. This Is How They Can ‘Turn Off Your Chip’ – Forbidden Knowledge TV. Retrieved September 23, 2018, from forbiddenknowledgetv.net/this-is-how-they-can-turn-off-your-chip/

Stifling Opinions in a Democracy by Large Techology, Internet, and Large Media

Again, someone is preventing me from properly formatting and publishing an article that I have written because they do not like the contents of the article.

It is a good thing that this is precisely what the U.S. White House is currently investigating about big technology and big internet companies and their interference in publishing of what they do not want in the public domain.

The Legal Office at Google and other companies should listen up, or, shall I say, read up?